- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
Update on United States Department of Agriculture’s Reorganization of Rural Development
CARH’s BROADCAST EMAIL – Legislative & Regulatory Update
May 12, 2017
On May 11th, CARH sent a broadcast email that discussed USDA’s reorganization of Rural Development (RD). The announcement would eliminate the position of Under Secretary of Rural Development’s (RD). At the time of the announcement, there were very few details about the reorganization other than the Department said that the rural development functions would elevate the mission of RD and individuals would report directly to the Secretary.
Late yesterday afternoon, CARH, together with other industries involved in rural development issues, met with key staff from the Senate. The staff had been briefed by officials from USDA on details of the reorganization. From information received, the reorganization would demote and not elevate RD’s mission areas. RD would, in fact, become an office within USDA with the Administrators becoming “Assistants” to the Secretary. There would be no Presidential nominee with Senate confirmation in the RD mission area.
All under secretaries, including the Under Secretary of Rural Development, already report directly to the Secretary. In its current position as a core USDA mission area overseen by an Under Secretary, RD holds a prominent position as part of the USDA Cabinet. By demoting RD to simply an “office” under the Secretary, it will lose its sub-Cabinet-level status and administrative authority if this reorganization takes place. There is concern that this could be quite problematic for programs as the federal budget process progresses both in Fiscal Year (FY) 2018 as well as FY 2019.
USDA is characterizing this as part of a larger reorganization called for in the 2014 Agriculture Act. That Act required the creation of a new Under Secretary for Trade and Foreign Agricultural Affairs. It in no way called for this creation of a new Under Secretary to impact RD. The Act required consultation with stakeholders and a report, which was prepared and issued by the National Academy of Public Administration for USDA in October 2015, which again did not call for any changes to RD. While the new Under Secretary for Trade and Foreign Agricultural Affairs was statutorily mandated, these other changes are part of something entirely unrelated and the trade issue is being used at the expense of RD. We believe that, at a minimum, this change is procedurally defective and USDA is simply trying to conflate an appropriate, statutory process, with an inappropriate ad hoc action.
While learning more yesterday afternoon regarding details of the reorganization, there are still several unanswered questions, such who would state directors report to, if in fact, there will be state directors. The House and Senate Agriculture Committees and House and Senate Agriculture Appropriations Subcommittees will be holding hearings during the next few weeks on a variety of policy issues. Rural housing is not particularly involved in international trade but we are proud to see USDA continue the ongoing work of the Foreign Agricultural Service and other international trade efforts already underway. But there is no reason why that should ever have impacted RD or its mission. We ask you to contact your members of Congress right away and tell them that international trade should not be linked to RD and should not be promoted at the expense of rural housing, the residents of rural housing, as well as other mission areas currently under RD. There should be an Under Secretary for Rural Development as well as one for Trade and Foreign Agricultural Affairs.
To see if your members of Congress are on one of the committees mentioned above, use the following links:
- Senate Committee on Agriculture Nutrition & Forestry
- House Committee on Agriculture
- Senate Committee on Appropriations; Subcommittee on Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies
- House Committee on Appropriations; Subcommittee on Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies
Members of Congress on the above committees will be important players in this reorganization. Therefore, if you live in a District or State where these members are from, it is important that you contact them and tell them not to support this reorganization as it is currently planned. If you have any questions or comments, please contact CARH at 703-837-9001 or carh@carh.org.