- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
House Ways & Means Committee’s Tax Reform Discussion Draft Would Alter the Housing Credit Program
CARH'S BROADCAST E-MAIL –
Legislative Update
February 27, 2014
On Wednesday, February 26, 2014, the Chairman of the Ways and Means Committee, Dave Camp (R-MI), unveiled a comprehensive tax reform discussion draft entitled the Tax Reform Act of 2014. This discussion draft is a result of almost three years of the Committee holding hearings in Washington and throughout the country, establishing special bipartisan working groups, traveling throughout the country and receiving input from various interest groups, including CARH, on the current tax code and provisions.
Prior to the release of Representative Camp's tax reform discussion draft, tax reform was something for Congress to talk about in theory, but not face the difficult choices that are inevitable (and unenviable) in this task. With this release, some of the potential contours and challenges of actually passing comprehensive tax reform will now be discussed more thoroughly.
The discussion draft and summary from the Joint Committee on Taxation encapsulate broad conceptual changes to the federal tax code. For affordable housing, while the working draft would preserve certain aspects of the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (Housing Credit) program, it would also make substantial changes that would make preservation of the rural housing portfolio almost impossible to do. Dozens of other corporate and other business tax expenditures would be eliminated as would other tax credit programs including the historic rehabilitation tax credit (HTC), the renewable energy investment tax credit (ITC), and production tax credit (PTC). The discussion draft does not include any reference to the new markets tax credit (NMTC), but the treatment would effectively end that program.
Specifically, the discussion draft would impact the Housing Credit by the following:
- Eliminate tax-exempt private activity bonds. Tax-exempt bonds support the financing of 40 percent of all Housing Credit development annually, including many preservation projects.
- Eliminate the 4 percent Housing Credit, which likely eliminates the acquisition credit used in preservation projects that also have 9 percent credits. Together with the elimination of tax-exempt bonds, this change appears to be very detrimental to the use of the Housing Credit for rural housing preservation activities.
- Change the length of the credit period from 10 to 15 years.
- Stipulate that housing finance agencies would allocate qualified basis rather than credit amounts, at a rate of $31.20 multiplied by the state's population, with a minimum of $36.3 million.
- Repeal the 130% basis boost for "high-cost and difficult development areas."
- Eliminate all special occupancy preferences except for individuals with special needs and veterans.
- Remove the requirement that states include energy efficiency and the historic nature of the project as selection criteria.
Overall, the draft asserts that these changes are expected to make the Housing Credit a less expensive program and thereby increase revenues by $10.7 billion over the period from 2014 to 2023. The discussion draft also indicates that the proposed changes would increase the amount of Housing Credit-financed projects by more than 5% (creating more projects at a lower cost to taxpayers); presumably on the theory that the elimination of the 130% boost will mean that Housing Credit allocations will be spread among more projects. Clearly, eliminating acquisition basis and private activity bonds will only serve to reduce the number of Housing Credit-financed projects.
It does not appear that House Leadership plans to move on Representative Camp's plan. Also, the Senate does not look like it is ready to follow Representative Camp's lead. New Senate Finance Committee Chairman Ron Wyden (D-OR) and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) have both stated that they did not believe the Senate would bring up tax reform this year. Nothing being reported in the President's Fiscal Year (FY) 2015 budget suggests the Administration wants to take up tax reform this year. It is in fact being reported that the Administration will seek to make the renewable energy production tax credit permanent and refundable; which is the opposite of cutting such credits.
Combine all of these challenges with the fact that we are in an election year, the likelihood of Representative Camp's plan seeing much movement is slim. Still, Representative Camp's plan is the first to put down a marker. While any future tax reform is virtually certain to be different, it is important to understand this becomes a starting point for future tax reform discussions in the 114th Congress or beyond. Therefore, it is even more important to make sure we are communicating what these changes mean for the future of rural housing.
More analysis of the nearly 1000 page discussion draft will be taking place over the next several weeks. It will be vitally important for CARH members to continue your grassroots efforts that show members of Congress the importance of the Housing Credit program, particularly since the important tool for rural housing preservation used today would be eliminated. Click here to contact your Representative and click here to contact your Senator.
CARH's board of directors will be meeting on March 12-13, 2014, in Washington, D.C. and the discussion draft will be a top priority at the meeting. The board will be meeting with key members of Congress on March 12, 2014.
Please contact the CARH national office at carh@carh.org or 703-837-9001 should you have questions or concerns.