- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
A First Look at IRS’s Opportunity Zone Proposed Regulations
UPDATE — Link to Proposed Regulations published in the Federal Register on October 29, 2018.
BROADCAST EMAIL – Regulatory Update
October 23, 2018
Forrest David Milder and Richard Michael Price of CARH’s General Counsel, Nixon Peabody, LLP, have provided a first look into the Opportunity Zone Proposed Regulations (Regulations) that the Department of Treasury posted, along with a summary, on October 19, 2018, in coordination with Revenue Ruling 2018–29. Opportunity Zones were created last year as part of the Tax Cut and Jobs Act, Public Law 115–97. The regulation package runs 74 pages, and addresses many, but not all, of the questions being asked by developers, investors, and their advisors. Many features are highlighted below, as well as note some continued outstanding questions.
What Taxes To Defer?
The Regulations clarify that only gains treated as capital gains for federal income tax purposes are eligible for deferral. Therefore, gains from selling property used in a trade or business (under Section 1231) should be eligible, while depreciation recapture and gain from ordinary sales of inventory do not qualify. Special rules are provided for Section 1256 gains and straddles.
Formation Basics
The Regulations plainly state that an Opportunity Zone Fund (Fund) must be “taxed as” a corporation or partnership, which should allow them to be set up as appropriately structured limited liability companies. Strangely, instructions for the draft self-certification form (Form 8996) on the IRS’s website STILL refer to entities “organized as” partnerships or corporations, thereby retaining the confusing wording of the Code section. Nixon Peabody is writing to the IRS to suggest that the form be corrected to use the same definition as the proposed regulations. A Fund can be organized in any state, or in a U.S. territory, or it can be organized in a territory but only if it is the same as the Opportunity Zone’s trade or business. Fund interests can be common or preferred, provided they are “equity” under standard tax principles. Debt is ineligible for favorable treatment.
How Many Funds?
It has been generally recommended one Fund per asset, given the ease of “self-certifying” Funds, and the potential tax consequences of dispositions. The Regulations only save taxes on a post-10-year disposition of an interest in the Fund, while a sale of the underlying asset held by the Fund will generally be taxable. Thus, having only one asset in each Fund will generally facilitate non-taxable sales of the interest to a buyer who might then liquidate the Fund (or continue to hold the property through such an entity). The Regulations facilitate this structure by making it clear that an investor can set up multiple Funds from a single capital gain, as long as there is no double counting.
Who Can Defer?
Persons or entities that recognize capital gain for federal income tax purposes are eligible for deferral. This includes a long laundry list of entities, including individuals, C corporations, regulated investment companies, REITs, and trusts, as well as partnerships and other pass-through entities, such as S corporations. As suggested in a letter Nixon Peabody previously authored to Treasury, in the case of pass-throughs, either the entity or, with a proper election, its partners or shareholders, can invest the entity’s gain in a Fund. Special timing rules may help a partner or shareholder of an S corporation get well more than 180 days after the gain occurs to make their investment.
Leverage and Liquidity
An investor in an Opportunity Fund can borrow money to make the investment, even pledging the interest as collateral for the loan. Importantly, the IRS addressed the technical concerns of some tax advisors by providing that borrowing at the entity level by a Fund that is a partnership will not be recharacterized as an additional capital contribution by the investors under Section 752(a).
Timing Concerns For Testing The Fund
Generally, the 180-day period to invest capital gain in an Opportunity Fund begins on the date on which the gain would be recognized for federal income tax purpose. As noted above, a special rule for pass-through entities may extend this significantly longer in certain situations. The Fund must then invest 90 percent of its funds in qualifying assets. Generally, the 90 percent test is assessed six months after the date selected as the start date for the Fund, and also at year end. If the first testing date would arise after the first (e.g., a Fund that starts in July or later), then only the year-end date applies. The 90 percent test is based on financial statements, or actual cost for taxpayers who don’t have financials, with a special rule that allows investors to use the method used by other members who own at least a five percent interest.
Timing Concerns For New Construction And Rehabilitations
In another place where the IRS adopted a rule like the one Nixon Peabody suggested in their letter to Treasury, the proposed Regulations provide a safe harbor to build or rehab a project of up to 31 months, provided the Fund has a written plan for the construction or rehabilitation, and it substantially complies with that plan. It should be noted that rather than referring to “rehabilitation” of used property, the applicable Code provision actually uses the words “with respect to” the used property, which (to our thinking) might be different from rehabilitation, and allow for more kinds of capital expenditures. However, the Regulations do not provide any additional guidance about this term. Nixon Peabody will be asking the IRS to address this issue.
What Can The Fund Invest In?
Funds can own Opportunity Zone businesses directly, or they can own partnership interests or stock in certain Opportunity Zone business entities. The Code requires that “substantially all” of a business’s assets must meet the requirements to be an Opportunity Zone Business, and the regulations defined this term to be “70 percent.”
What About Land?
Another important provision in the Regulations is the exclusion of land when computing the required capital expenditures for used property. For example, if a Fund acquires land for $1 million and an existing building for $2 million, it only has to incur capital expenditures of another $2 million with respect to the used property to pass the substantial improvement requirement. Rev. Rul. 2018-29 provides illustrations.
IRS Forms
There are two IRS forms. Form 8949 is used to report that you are deferring a capital gain. Form 8996 will be used for initial self-certification of the Fund and for annual reporting of compliance with the 90-Percent Asset Test.
Disposition Basics
A taxpayer may sell a Fund investment, but if it sells only a portion, the Regulations generally provide that the Fund interests disposed of must be identified using a first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. A pro rata method will sometimes apply. If a taxpayer sells ALL of its interest at a gain prior to 2027, it can (if it chooses) make a new election and roll over this new gain.
How To Dispose And Not Pay Taxes On The Fund Investment?
The Regulations provide that the no-tax-after-10-years rule applies to any Fund investment made on or before June 30, 2027 (provided the investment meets the other requirements, like the 180-day rule, which may run out before that date). Recognizing that the current designations for opportunity zones will expire in ten years, the Regulations somewhat arbitrarily terminate the no-tax rule on December 31, 2047.
What’s Next?
In addition to these Regulations, a second round of proposed regulations is anticipated. Issues expected to be addressed include: the meaning of “substantially all”, which also appears in other places in the Opportunity Zone statute; identifying the transactions that may trigger the inclusion of gain; the “reasonable period” for a Fund to reinvest proceeds from the sale of qualifying assets without paying a penalty; administrative rules applicable to a Fund that fails to maintain the required 90 percent investment standard; and information-reporting requirements.
During CARH’s Midyear Meeting January 28-30, 2019, the Opportunity Zone proposed regulations and how it will affect developers, investors, and advisors will be more thoroughly discussed. If you haven’t registered for the Midyear Meeting, click here to download the registration form.